A recent Supreme Court ruling has created significant legal roadblocks for the implementation of wealth taxes targeting the ultra-wealthy's unrealized gains. In the case Moore v. United States, four Supreme Court justices indicated that taxing unrealized income could violate the 16th Amendment's realization requirement for federal taxes.
America’s Last Election New documentary, America’s Last Election, reveals the true (and terrifying) story of how the D.C. establishment has engineered a brutal new crisis that could hand them permanent power. Power they will use to reshape America to their dark, dystopian vision. Start streaming it now at no cost here |
This raises major constitutional questions around proposals like:
• President Biden's "billionaire tax" plan to apply a 25% tax rate on unrealized gains for households worth over $100 million
• The annual wealth tax plans previously proposed by Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders during the 2020 Democratic primaries
• Senator Ron Wyden's plan to tax unrealized gains through "mark-to-market" taxation each year
While the Court didn't directly rule on wealth taxes, the justices' opinions suggest these types of taxes on paper profits could be unconstitutional "direct taxes" requiring state population apportionment - an insurmountable hurdle.
So what does this mean for everyday investors?
-
Less Threat of Forced Selling for the Ultra-Rich
One major concern around wealth taxes was that billionaire investors may need to sell assets en masse to pay taxes on paper gains. This ruling makes that scenario less likely, removing potential asset price pressures. -
Wealthy to Keep Using Tax Planning Strategies
Expect very wealthy investors to continue leveraging sophisticated tax planning within the existing rules to minimize taxes, rather than facing an outright wealth tax. -
Renewed Focus on Income/Investment Taxes
With wealth taxes facing legal headwinds, lawmakers may revive efforts to raise taxes on actual realized income, capital gains, dividends, and corporate taxes instead. -
Policy Uncertainty to Linger
While the Court's opinions create significant barriers to annual wealth taxes, their ultimate constitutionality remains uncertain pending any new legal challenges. This overhang could keep some wealthy investors defensive. -
Alternative Proposals to Target the Wealthy
Expect legislators to explore other ways to increase taxes on the ultra-rich that can withstand legal scrutiny, such as:
- Higher income tax rates on top brackets
- Raising rates on capital gains/dividends
- Reforms to "carried interest" rules
- Corporate tax hikes
- Eliminating tax breaks/preferences
- Higher estate taxes
While straightforward wealth taxes appear to face an uphill battle, the policy debate is far from over on whether and how to increase taxes on the wealthiest taxpayers and investors.
For long-term investors, it's important to be aware of these potential tax law changes which could impact realized returns, asset location decisions, and overall financial planning strategies - especially for those building significant wealth. Working closely with financial advisors to analyze proposals and leverage available tax minimization strategies will be critical amid this fluid policy landscape.
Pentagon Contract Could Send $2 AI Stock Soaring
Whenever the Department of Defense awards a major AI contract...
Early investors could see dramatic returns virtually overnight.
That's how my readers were able to cash in gains like 133% in just four months on C3.ai...
213% on Palantir...
And 339% in just four months on Intelsat...
Right now, this tiny $2 AI stock is positioned for a similar leap...
It's a company at the forefront of a technological breakthrough in defense...
And positioned to land a big piece of a $20 billion dollar Pentagon contract.
All the best,
Simmy Adelman, Publisher
Behind the Markets